Frankly, it doesn't look like a picture of me. My only response to "The Online Discernmentalist Mafia" blog. I believe I will find a better watchdog photo for my blog as a result of this photo.
I have recieved a response from Susan Castillo and I am convinced that Denise of Surph’s Side blog is guilty of slander. In addition, Christian Research Network is guilty of spreading slander for not checking the accuracy of gossip posted on Surph’s Side blog. Was it too much for both to check the accuracy of their claimed facts before publishing something on the internet. Neither Surph’s Side blog or Christian Research Network has obeyed the Bible on this matter and are guilty of sin!!!!! REPENT!!!!!
Greetings, Ron,
These are my sole comments on this matter…
Great care was taken during this class to differentiate between that material which was presented to provide historical background/ an understanding of other denominations and that which might be considered appropriate and useful in the context of the Protestant, and particularly the Reformed, community of faith. Anything that was endorsed was biblically based, theologically sound, and in no way violated the spirit of those reflections of Luther as they appeared in the article. For the record, I have never before heard of the DVD of a coincidentally similar title on which I was accused of basing my class.
Sincerely.
Susan Castillo
The blogs that have posted on this matter:
I am considering making this photo the official watchdog photo of my blog.
